|
Post by thunderwing on Jan 2, 2019 13:25:30 GMT
The Reynolution continues. Original for you Shaddy although I do sense a teeny rip off of Peter Andres "Insania" Here's a little taster Insanity is slowly, creeping into our lives, yeah Where is yesterday? Cause people ain't the same Have we lost the faith? Or have we lost our minds Where are we going? Does anyone care? Hold on to real love There's so much to share Anyway moving on I'd love to hear how you would have handled The Marginson situation. The Greaves situation. The Reynolds situation. Can't wait. Thanks edit- you are allowed to post your response under one of your other names edit - whilst I am on how many of you still attend the FC games? <NAMES REMOVED by Admin> and the bookie don't. <NAME REMOVED by Admin> does occasionally. That's a lot of work for you to be getting on with.
|
|
|
Post by robthebuilder on Jan 2, 2019 13:56:41 GMT
The Reynolds Situation ? I'd Rather Jack ! 😄
|
|
|
Post by glumfcer on Jan 2, 2019 15:21:05 GMT
merely the vultures coming home to roost all situations would have been managed better without hate and with the missing 2000 in place more cokey cokey drivel SORBONNE my arse
|
|
|
Post by robthebuilder on Jan 2, 2019 16:12:04 GMT
The Greaves Situation. How many football managers do you know that had to call 'The Powers That Be' during a match, to see if the club could afford to bring on a substitute Lunatics running the asylum !
|
|
|
Post by TomSpotley on Jan 2, 2019 16:26:26 GMT
I saw <NAME REMOVED by Admin> selling programmes outside the ground after 2015...
|
|
|
Post by freebarrygeorge on Jan 2, 2019 19:29:36 GMT
The Reynolution continues. Anyway moving on I'd love to hear how you would have handled The Marginson situation. I Would certainly have replaced him as he had gone as far as he could possibly go. But I would have replaced him with the dignity his service and his achievements over the years deserved and not the way your beloved PM, shock of shocks, humiliated him, accused him and character assassinated him (but of course your perfect PM aint got form for that has he)>The Greaves situation. Greaves was a PM influenced appointment who like the above ended up being humiliated, accused and character assassinated by guess who???The Reynolds situation. Reynolds like the Fat Controller was hand picked for the position without any open or transparent interview process by guess who? The Fat Controller has already met his fate by funnily enough being humiliated, accused and character assassinated by guess who??? Wonder how long it is till Reyno is being humiliated, accused and character assassinated by guess who??? Care to put forward your prediction on the Reyno Sweepstake?
Can't wait. Thanks edit- you are allowed to post your response under one of your other names edit - whilst I am on how many of you still attend the FC games? <NAMES REMOVED by Admin> I dont because of the vile actions and thuggery of the man who stated "I created this club and I will destroy it", and who will shortly get his wish which strangely enough was guess who?Hope that answers your questions clearly enough. And please dont come up with your usual shite that you dont even know who "guess who" is!! Now run along back to the toxic forum where you belong and where your days, and our once beloved clubs days are numbered because of "guess who".
|
|
|
Post by freebarrygeorge on Jan 4, 2019 6:08:04 GMT
Morning and Happy New Year Thunders.
Wonder if when you have got a moment, seeing as I have had the courtesy to give you an answer to your questions, if indeed you could give us an answer to them and also give us your your thoughts on whether you consider the comments of an ex, very short serving, and very influential board member on the Toxic Forum and indeed the members Forum regarding those situations to have been apt, ethical and helpful.
To save you a bit of time I repeat them below:-.
How you would have handled
1) The Marginson situation.
2) The Greaves situation.
3)The Reynolds situation.
Hope you are well and wonder if you have heard anything about the fate of old Lawman??? Hope the same doesnt happen to you until at least you have answered this post.
Bye hopefully only for now and finest regards.
George
|
|
|
Post by robthebuilder on Jan 4, 2019 15:51:09 GMT
The Marginson Situation.
Never relegated.
The Greaves Situation.
Never relgated.
The Reynolds Situation.
Going to need 100% support from 'The Powers That Be' ?
|
|
|
Post by thunderwing on Jan 4, 2019 16:07:10 GMT
Morning and Happy New Year Thunders. Wonder if when you have got a moment, seeing as I have had the courtesy to give you an answer to your questions, if indeed you could give us an answer to them and also give us your your thoughts on whether you consider the comments of an ex, very short serving, and very influential board member on the Toxic Forum and indeed the members Forum regarding those situations to have been apt, ethical and helpful. It's that persons opinion but to answer your question I do agree that they are apt, ethical and helpful. The Toxic Forum? How ironic.To save you a bit of time I repeat them below:-. How you would have handled 1) The Marginson situation. Sacked him at the end of the previous season. Negotiated the deal that he left with. During the first few years of his tenure he built three or four different teams and was very successful. It was a mistake giving him the type of contract he had. If I would have had a watch it wouldn't have happened on mine that's for sure. He wasn't equipped to manage in this league and his lack of technical knowledge showed as did his attitude, lack of qualifications (and pursuing such) and those of his coaching staff. His comments "it's football" at the announcement of his appointment were met with applause and he was the right man for the job at the right time. Clearly he didn't have a clue about football at it's current level given the dross that was served up every week2) The Greaves situation. Sacked him before he had the chance to resign and got Soule and Chadwick in to steady the ship. Knee jerk appointment in my opinion. Kept us up through pseudo hero worship and luck. You would have thought the Queen had died (as an example) given all the hysteria and backslapping on the FC United Facebook page. "You let down you're people Evita, you were supposed to have been immortal". He was the wrong man for the job it was far too big for him. Great player as his record shows in a lower league and still banging them in at Ossett (an even lower league) I believe. Still fancied himself at this level but wasn't good enough as a player or a manager. Two faced.3)The Reynolds situation. The manager was appointed after a fair and lengthy process as I am sure you are aware. I think he will turn it around now that all the dead wood has been jettisoned. He was left with a legacy of failure living on the fumes of faux euphoria and players that just weren't good enough. Hope you are well and wonder if you have heard anything about the fate of old Lawman??? Hope the same doesn't happen to you until at least you have answered this post. No idea about the Lawman. What's going to happen to me?Bye hopefully only for now and finest regards. George
|
|
|
Post by freebarrygeorge on Jan 4, 2019 19:55:22 GMT
1) The Marginson situation.
You have exactly the same opinion of Margy as the PM. Amazing really! Would you have humiliated him, accused him and character assassinated him on both the Toxic Forum and the Members forum and do think that was the correct and ethical thing to do by the PM???
2) The Greaves situation.
Ditto the above
3) The Reynolds situation. Correct or not that Reyno was 100% the PM's man for the job and that the PM interviewed him and recommended him for the job to the Chair Slinger and co? Is the footy any better now under Reyno than it was under Margy or Greavsy and are the results any better?? Who will you and the PM blame when Reyno fails and will you be happy when the humiliation, accusations and general character assassination that will inevitably follow start again by the PM???
|
|
|
Post by glumfcer on Jan 4, 2019 20:00:07 GMT
What objective evidence is there that Tom Greaves is 'two faced' and did you call him that to his one face big man?
|
|
|
Post by TomSpotley on Jan 5, 2019 5:51:49 GMT
'All the dead wood has been jettisoned'
Most of the squad actually remains the same from when Greaves had it. Reyno has added a few players, I've heard the football is a bit better but results are hardly showing that. I do hope the vests are telling him something, or is it only the PM who has access to that information? 😂
|
|
|
Post by freebarrygeorge on Jan 5, 2019 17:47:10 GMT
Evening Thunders Quick question for you. How would you handle the Reyno situation and do you thing that old Puppers will admit that his choice of manager was unfortunately poor or that it would be preferable to start humiliated him, accused him and character assassinated him on two other forums that have connections with FC?? Look forward to hearing your answer Love you xxxxxxxx
|
|
|
Post by jeepster on Jan 5, 2019 19:46:51 GMT
The PM has weaseled out of so many problems of his doing by blaming all and sundry, but his name is all over this appointment and situation. Expect every excuse and all and everybody to be chucked under the bus, before his man and his decision comes under scrutiny. The comparisons with Trumps' behaviour,as a fellow psyscopath, continues.
It seems we are bringing in more players to try to improve things and stave off relegation.
The identical situaion as the club was in last year and let to continual overspends on the football budget.
This in turn led to long-term abuse of the board who sanctioned it from the PM, who agreed that he was correct in everything, all in his special hindsight vision obviously. The usual charmless abuse eventually led to the situation where the Board now has only 2 members, chief lickspittle and ex-fanboy, and barely functions as a Board should.
The other 2017/18 season Board Members' over-spending was reported retrospectively and led to TG also being brought under the toxic spotlight.
What will happen this season in relation to highlighting the overspends this season? Very little I suspect despite the situation being almost identical. Difference is that this Manager was recruited by just one single Member*, so is his man and his overspend.
*Did anybody else wonder why nothing was said about this strange decision. Thought the gullible loved a good Animal Farm allegory. "We are all equal but some are more equal than others".
|
|
|
Post by thunderwing on Jan 5, 2019 23:17:58 GMT
1) The Marginson situation. You have exactly the same opinion of Margy as the PM. Amazing really! Would you have humiliated him, accused him and character assassinated him on both the Toxic Forum and the Members forum and do think that was the correct and ethical thing to do by the PM??? 2) The Greaves situation. Ditto the above 3) The Reynolds situation. Correct or not that Reyno was 100% the PM's man for the job and that the PM interviewed him and recommended him for the job to the Chair Slinger and co? Is the footy any better now under Reyno than it was under Margy or Greavsy and are the results any better?? Who will you and the PM blame when Reyno fails and will you be happy when the humiliation, accusations and general character assassination that will inevitably follow start again by the PM??? Incorrect Bazza. It was a club appointment. Reyno wont fail. The burden he has at the moment because of the number of contracts dished out to less than mediocre players is a key factor. A total waste of the player budget. He is doing a juggling job and managing a team that plays for the shirt and the fans. Still plenty to play for.
|
|