|
|
Post by freebarrygeorge on Oct 1, 2021 9:01:32 GMT
Who's gonna blink first between the chair slinger and JP's ex board meeting informer??
Who's going to stand for election??
Who's not / is stand for re-election
Are any of the current board going to resign??
Can FC still carry on with just one board member or more likely none??
What involvement has puppers got in all this??
When will the food hub be purchasing supplies from Fortnum and Masons and will it be cheaper than where they got stuff from in August?
Will Hipz put himself up for the board
Will Hipz cease talking in riddles in his election hustings??
Will lummox Leighton make a sensible post on TSIG of fissial??
Any refunds??
Indeed interesting times ahead.
|
|
|
|
Post by jeepster on Oct 1, 2021 10:23:45 GMT
Will the sighting of AW on TV create fever pitch?
Will anybody who ever lived in Colwyn Bay ever have anybody interested in their drivel?
|
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Oct 4, 2021 14:48:17 GMT
There are further interesting posts on the official regarding the food hub, in particular from the CS. The fact that he has to post on there rather than speak directly to the other long standing board member shows that all trust and communication has broken down between them irretrievably. One of them has to step down.
|
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Oct 13, 2021 9:55:19 GMT
The tit for tat between the two longstanding board members is getting worse on the Food Hud thread on the official. Some very uncomfortable personal issues are being raised which should not be aired on a semi-public forum. It is impossible for the Club to function with both of them still in Board positions. The sooner one of them goes the sooner the other can get on with sorting the mess out. If they both can't see that then it shows they are both on the Board for their own benefit and the personal kudos they both think they benefit from.
|
|
|
|
Post by freebarrygeorge on Oct 13, 2021 19:26:50 GMT
Anyhow all should be good shortly coz the RWH will be on the Board!! Lets see how long he lasts when every little move he makes is forensically scrutinised by cunts like......erm the RWH  |
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Oct 13, 2021 20:19:57 GMT
We need some transparency from him on the implications of rule number 66 before he stands for election:-
66. No person can be a member of the Club Board who:
a. is subject to a bankruptcy order or has in place a composition with their creditors;
b. is subject to a disqualification order made under the Company Directors Disqualification Act;
c. has a conviction for an indictable offence (other than a spent conviction as defined by the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974);
d. is or may on the basis of medical evidence be suffering from mental disorder;
e. fails to abide by any rules for the conduct of elections made by the Club Board.
|
|
|
|
Post by freebarrygeorge on Oct 13, 2021 20:36:49 GMT
We need some transparency from him on the implications of rule number 66 before he stands for election:- 66. No person can be a member of the Club Board who: a. is subject to a bankruptcy order or has in place a composition with their creditors; b. is subject to a disqualification order made under the Company Directors Disqualification Act; c. has a conviction for an indictable offence (other than a spent conviction as defined by the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974); d. is or may on the basis of medical evidence be suffering from mental disorder; e. fails to abide by any rules for the conduct of elections made by the Club Board. Kin hell he fails miserably on at least c and d! How the fuck did the Chair Slinger get round c  ? |
|
|
|
Post by freebarrygeorge on Oct 14, 2021 6:25:43 GMT
What is very interesting with the "evidence" provided so far by CS is that regarding Foodhubgate that the 3 other Directors disagreed with his actions as did another prominent figure and that another one obviously let her thoughts about him known to the others within the club in a slightly OTT manner. Perhaps the CS should take a hard long look at himself and do the honourable thing www.youtube.com/watch?v=4L_yCwFD6Jo ? ? ? Whatever transpires it is (and always was) a very sad indictment on this once great Club and the majority of its loyal innocent members how a few narcistic nutcases wash their very dirty laundry on an easily available social media site. Which reminds me, where is JP nowadays or has he morphed into the RWH? On another note, wanker of the week award once again goes to the Jolly Green Tattooed Lummox who has to get his pennysworth in. Someone nudge the big overgrown dick head and tell him that calling someone a "lickspittle" does not gain you credibility. |
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Oct 14, 2021 9:02:52 GMT
What is very interesting with the "evidence" provided so far by CS is that regarding Foodhubgate that the 3 other Directors disagreed with his actions as did another prominent figure and that another one obviously let her thoughts about him known to the others within the club in a slightly OTT manner. The CS may have had some valid questions within the whole affair but the fact that he wasn't listened to and appears to have had disagreements with a number of people at the heart of the Club it may seem to an outsider to show how much he is disliked. I appreciate being liked isn't a requirement to be a Board member but when it goes the opposite way and key employees, club officials and volunteers are not prepared to engage effectively and openly with that Board member it's the Club and the membership that suffers. Realistically there can only be one answer to that. What's the big deal? He would only be one of a large number who have resigned and walked away since 2015. |
|
|
|
Post by thunderwing on Oct 14, 2021 11:33:15 GMT
The tit for tat between the two longstanding board members is getting worse on the Food Hud thread on the official. Some very uncomfortable personal issues are being raised which should not be aired on a semi-public forum. It is impossible for the Club to function with both of them still in Board positions. The sooner one of them goes the sooner the other can get on with sorting the mess out. If they both can't see that then it shows they are both on the Board for their own benefit and the personal kudos they both think they benefit from. Is that INDA |
|
|
|
Post by freebarrygeorge on Oct 14, 2021 17:09:35 GMT
The tit for tat between the two longstanding board members is getting worse on the Food Hud thread on the official. Some very uncomfortable personal issues are being raised which should not be aired on a semi-public forum. It is impossible for the Club to function with both of them still in Board positions. The sooner one of them goes the sooner the other can get on with sorting the mess out. If they both can't see that then it shows they are both on the Board for their own benefit and the personal kudos they both think they benefit from. Is that INDA When you get on the board Nipz hope you will be transparent and answer questions honestly. I say:- "VOTE FOR NIPZ" |
|
|
|
Post by thunderwing on Oct 15, 2021 14:59:35 GMT
When you get on the board Nipz hope you will be transparent and answer questions honestly. I say:- "DON'T VOTE FOR PIPZ UNLESS YOU HAVE GOT BIG LIPZ A VOTE FOR HIPZ IS A VOTE FOR ZIPZ" |
|
|
|
Post by freebarrygeorge on Oct 15, 2021 18:34:56 GMT
When you get on the board Nipz hope you will be transparent and answer questions honestly. I say:- "DON'T VOTE FOR PIPZ UNLESS YOU HAVE GOT BIG LIPZ A VOTE FOR HIPZ IS A VOTE FOR ZIPZ"Dick head |
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Oct 21, 2021 9:23:00 GMT
The deadline to put yourself forward to stand for the Board is 5.00 pm today. I wonder if we will see any interesting interpretation of the rules by any candidates. Not just rule 66 quoted above.
CONSTITUTION OF CLUB BOARD
61.
b. Members wishing to be considered for election to the Club Board should be
endorsed by not fewer than 5 other members who, in granting their endorsement,
state that to the best of their knowledge the member seeking election to the Club
Board fulfils the criteria set out in these rules
In other words any member endorsing a candidate should make absolutely sure that the candidate's application complies with the rules.
64. Members of the Club Board will normally serve for periods of 2 years in accordance with
the Board Membership Policy.
67. Any member of the Club Board who:
a. ceases to comply with the criteria set out in these Rules; or
c. resigns. is to vacate the office of Club Board member
In other words you serve for two years and if you decide to resign and not serve your 2 year period you're off the Board. If you try to do otherwise you have not complied with the rules.
|
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Oct 21, 2021 14:08:35 GMT
It appears that the CS is resigning after a year and then re-standing for the Board. He obviously has his own interpretation of rules 64 and 67. I wonder which members have endorsed him.
|
|
?