|
|
Post by glumfcer on Sept 18, 2017 20:22:32 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by glumfcer on Sept 18, 2017 20:37:45 GMT
Here's the real twaddle fella
Admin note: Glumfcer posted a link to a book, but we don't need to give that particular volume the oxygen of publicity. You can guess which book without us having clickbait on here
|
|
|
|
Post by mufcum on Sept 19, 2017 15:00:31 GMT
Was the PM paid as the programme editor?
|
|
|
|
Post by mufcum on Sept 22, 2017 14:29:09 GMT
Did he go through a recruitment process for it?
|
|
|
|
Post by artirles on Sept 24, 2017 11:48:15 GMT
Yes
No
|
|
|
|
Post by artirles on Sept 24, 2017 11:49:51 GMT
Its rumoured that back in time the 1st volunteer to insist on being paid to continue their role was the programme editor.
|
|
|
|
Post by mufcum on Sept 24, 2017 13:30:27 GMT
So he made money out of FC as the programme editor and now he's making money out of FC with his book. That's money the club could do with.
He didn't go through any sort of interview process either? Aren't both of those his biggest gripes about other people at FC? Seems like he changes his principles to suit himself.
|
|
|
|
Post by fcum on Sept 24, 2017 14:45:51 GMT
So he made money out of FC as the programme editor and now he's making money out of FC with his book. That's money the club could do with. He didn't go through any sort of interview process either? Aren't both of those his biggest gripes about other people at FC? Seems like he changes his principles to suit himself. Isn't he making money from agreeing a fee to write a book and then writing the book? Do you think a sports reporter who pens some thoughts about today's game should give his fee to FC because he's clearly making money out of the club? |
|
|
|
Post by mufcum on Sept 24, 2017 16:06:15 GMT
If he was just some random journo you might have a point, but he isn't and you haven't. Most people at FC put the club before themselves, he seems to do the opposite.
|
|
