|
Post by thunderwing on Mar 5, 2020 10:20:36 GMT
There isn't one fact in your previous post. You are the one making assertions. I'll admit to using F*ckwit. Glad you've toned down the insults btw. So in the view of you 2 (probably 1!!) calling someone a prick is unacceptable on a forum but calling them a C*nt, t*at, Spas**c, cr*ppl* and Fuc*wit and thief etc along with threats of violence is? ? Give your heads a wobble ffs!!
Perhaps if the mods on TSIG had drawn a line on insults and abuse several paces beyond calling someone a prick all those years ago and the liccle one had carried out his Coup in a more dignified manner without acting like a KGB thug that the "many hundreds" (HOPE THAT DOES NOT NEED YOUR SUBSTANTIATION!!) who walked away would have remained?"So regarding the first above paragraph, your leader never used any of those phrases and never made any threats of violence?? Or perhaps it was ok for insults and abuse to be placed on TSIO and The Sanc (or in your opinion was that a figment of the Fuckwits imagination)?? Or are you saying that the Coup by your leader never happened or that it was dignified?? Or perhaps "many hundreds" didnt walk away?? Come on spudda, either you or Lawz answer the above!! Over to you! Keep digging Ruprecht Like I said I have used F*ckwit. Assume you've checked use of all those other terms in Pandora's box and other available sources. I can't comment on what I can't see on TSIO or other media I don't go on can I? Whether it's a figment of anybody's imagination is a matter for debate and I believe we've already been though that. Coup? You're being a bit melodramatic aren't you? Grown up people made up their own minds either way about what happened and based their decisions thereon. I can only comment on published fact. Lots of posters on here have their own fundamentally wrong interpretation but hey that's up to them isn't it? For clarity Baz - the latter period of the so called halcyon days masked a lot of mistakes and the fundamental misunderstandings of how FC actually was being run (into the ground*). The club is now on a firmer commercial footing, the team is playing well and we are heading in the right direction. * excuse the pun
|
|
|
Post by freebarrygeorge on Mar 5, 2020 11:39:19 GMT
So in the view of you 2 (probably 1!!) calling someone a prick is unacceptable on a forum but calling them a C*nt, t*at, Spas**c, cr*ppl* and Fuc*wit and thief etc along with threats of violence is? ? Give your heads a wobble ffs!!
Perhaps if the mods on TSIG had drawn a line on insults and abuse several paces beyond calling someone a prick all those years ago and the liccle one had carried out his Coup in a more dignified manner without acting like a KGB thug that the "many hundreds" (HOPE THAT DOES NOT NEED YOUR SUBSTANTIATION!!) who walked away would have remained?"So regarding the first above paragraph, your leader never used any of those phrases and never made any threats of violence?? Or perhaps it was ok for insults and abuse to be placed on TSIO and The Sanc (or in your opinion was that a figment of the Fuckwits imagination)?? Or are you saying that the Coup by your leader never happened or that it was dignified?? Or perhaps "many hundreds" didnt walk away?? Come on spudda, either you or Lawz answer the above!! Over to you! Keep digging Ruprecht Like I said I have used F*ckwit. Assume you've checked use of all those other terms in Pandora's box and other available sources. I can't comment on what I can't see on TSIO or other media I don't go on can I? Whether it's a figment of anybody's imagination is a matter for debate and I believe we've already been though that. Coup? You're being a bit melodramatic aren't you? Grown up people made up their own minds either way about what happened and based their decisions thereon. I can only comment on published fact. Lots of posters on here have their own fundamentally wrong interpretation but hey that's up to them isn't it? For clarity Baz - the latter period of the so called halcyon days masked a lot of mistakes and the fundamental misunderstandings of how FC actually was being run (into the ground*). The club is now on a firmer commercial footing, the team is playing well and we are heading in the right direction. * excuse the pun Thundz have you ever considered for one minute that the posters on here have fundamentally the right interpretation of what happened based on provable facts in what they read and what they saw?? fcumfans.freeforums.net/attachment/download/1Regarding the "firmer financial footing" that YOU have asserted it would be very interesting to see how you arrived at that and to what extent the debts of the club have been reduced since 2015 and how the income has increased since 2015. I appreciate that the current board have done a spectacularly good job of cutting costs to the bone and rescheduling debts, which without doubt they deserve the uttermost credit for but I fail to understand how things have intrinsically changed with an entity morally owing in excess of £3million with a net income that clearly fails to even touch the interest repayments let alone the capital. Now its your words that I have stated not mine so come on, substantiate them!! To have put such statements you obviously are a sensible chappy who does have a reasonable knowledge of whats going on in the club.
|
|
|
Post by freebarrygeorge on Mar 5, 2020 11:41:15 GMT
Like I said I have used F*ckwit. Assume you've checked use of all those other terms in Pandora's box and other available sources. I can't comment on what I can't see on TSIO or other media I don't go on can I? Whether it's a figment of anybody's imagination is a matter for debate and I believe we've already been though that. Coup? You're being a bit melodramatic aren't you? Grown up people made up their own minds either way about what happened and based their decisions thereon. I can only comment on published fact. Lots of posters on here have their own fundamentally wrong interpretation but hey that's up to them isn't it? For clarity Baz - the latter period of the so called halcyon days masked a lot of mistakes and the fundamental misunderstandings of how FC actually was being run (into the ground*). The club is now on a firmer commercial footing, the team is playing well and we are heading in the right direction. * excuse the pun Thundz have you ever considered for one minute that the posters on here have fundamentally the right interpretation of what happened based on provable facts in what they read and what they saw?? fcumfans.freeforums.net/attachment/download/1Regarding the "firmer commercial footing" that YOU have asserted it would be very interesting to see how you arrived at that and to what extent the debts of the club have been reduced since 2015 and how the income has increased since 2015. I appreciate that the current board have done a spectacularly good job of cutting costs to the bone and rescheduling debts, which without doubt they deserve the uttermost credit for but I fail to understand how things have intrinsically changed with an entity morally owing in excess of £3million with a net income that clearly fails to even touch the interest repayments let alone the capital. Now its your words that I have stated not mine so come on, substantiate them!! To have put such statements you obviously are a sensible chappy who does have a reasonable knowledge of whats going on in the club.
|
|
|
Post by thunderwing on Mar 5, 2020 11:51:47 GMT
Thundz have you ever considered for one minute that the posters on here have fundamentally the right interpretation of what happened based on provable facts in what they read and what they saw?? fcumfans.freeforums.net/attachment/download/1Regarding the "firmer commercial footing" that YOU have asserted it would be very interesting to see how you arrived at that and to what extent the debts of the club have been reduced since 2015 and how the income has increased since 2015. I appreciate that the current board have done a spectacularly good job of cutting costs to the bone and rescheduling debts, which without doubt they deserve the uttermost credit for but I fail to understand how things have intrinsically changed with an entity morally owing in excess of £3million with a net income that clearly fails to even touch the interest repayments let alone the capital. Now its your words that I have stated not mine so come on, substantiate them!! To have put such statements you obviously are a sensible chappy who does have a reasonable knowledge of whats going on in the club. That's already been posted on here. What does it actually prove? There is no particular name associated with it. If you read it then you can see it refers to " We created the club...................." That could be interpreted very widely including everybody collectively who contributed in 2005 so hence hundreds of people. I get all my information from being a member. I'm hardly going to disclose anything on here am I? No doubt there are people who have retained their membership. If you are a member then you would also be able to have this information.
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Apr 7, 2020 11:32:59 GMT
The Chairman has shown his true colours again in a sarcastic sniping reply to some reasonable questions asked by a former board member on the April 1st Board Meeting thread on the official.
The Chairman is then backed up by a mini pack revealing once again the default mindset at the Club. Nothing changes.
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Jan 28, 2021 19:27:58 GMT
I see that in Board elections this month, of such a small number of members voting, approximately a quarter did not want the chairman on the board. There’ s hope yet.
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Jul 17, 2021 7:46:00 GMT
Voting numbers declined even further in the June GM. Only 53 voted.
It’s ripe for a takeover lads ‘n’ lasses.
|
|
|
Post by thunderwing on Jul 19, 2021 9:12:56 GMT
Voting numbers declined even further in the June GM. Only 53 voted. It’s ripe for a takeover lads ‘n’ lasses. 468 and 172 days respectively between those 2 previous posts. Conclusions. 1. The revolution is a slow burner. 2. "The real Red Rebels - It's rip for a takeover lads 'n' lasses" is still in draft form.
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Sept 9, 2021 15:11:44 GMT
There's trouble at' mill again. A cracking read on the official. There's hardly a board to speak of but they ain't getting on.
|
|
callum
Junior Member
Posts: 59
|
Post by callum on Sept 9, 2021 19:05:20 GMT
Looks like someone didn't like being outvoted in a board meeting and has slung his toys out of the pram
Plus ca change and all that
|
|
|
Post by jeepster on Sept 9, 2021 19:16:33 GMT
Remind us who's on the board now? Is it 2 shysters and a Shannon?
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Sept 10, 2021 8:35:08 GMT
Shannon has gone and it's two new ones who must wonder what the f*** they have walked in to. The other two long standing protagonists are getting a big dollop of karmah. They ought to do the decent thing and resign but the perceived kudos for one and the perceived help to his career for the other means their egos won't let them.
|
|
|
Post by thunderwing on Sept 10, 2021 12:10:14 GMT
Shannon has gone and it's two new ones who must wonder what the f*** they have walked in to. The other two long standing protagonists are getting a big dollop of karmah. They ought to do the decent thing and resign but the perceived kudos for one and the perceived help to his career for the other means their egos won't let them. Absolute conkers
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Sept 11, 2021 8:12:54 GMT
Absolute stonkers
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Sept 22, 2021 9:48:13 GMT
A member I.S. has for a few months been asking very pertinent questions on the official and gradually drawing important information out of Board members and committee volunteers which otherwise wouldn't have come to light. He is obviously very capable with experience in pertinent areas outside FC. His posts are calm, polite and well thought through and yet he still has to put up with sneering replies and innuendo from the likes of the barristers son and the former HR expert. They obviously cannot tolerate anyone questioning the group speak that lies at the heart of the Club.
This is compounded with the Chair Slinger (CS) waking up again after his playground spat with his board colleague to launch back into his usual sermon from the mount mode. He states "the archaic volunteer handbook is an example of the arogance of FC's past". What??? How long has he and the former HR expert been around? If it upsets him so much what has he been doing for the past 5 years? In truth it is nothing, a red herring, but it gives him chance to make an attempt at diversion and putting down a previous regime when he is concerned about being shown up by a current member.
The CS in another brief sermon continues to big himself up with "FC United is regarded as a leading light of the supporter owned movement and it is important we have a voice and engage in reviews of football governance." I've got news for him. It ceased to be regarded as a leading light since around the time he came onto the Board and anyone who knows FC knows that, including MCC and the football supporters movement.
The sooner the CS has one too many playground spats and decides to resign the better.
|
|