Another question for the 3 amigos 😁

I wouldn't have done anything differently because the following is what inspired us to rid FC of the parasites & leeches. There were no parasites and leeches in the first 10/11 years of the Club. There were droves of people giving up their spare time and doing everything they could as volunteers to make a success of the place. A parasite or leech would be a good description of somebody who causes a shit storm in a successful organisation and then earns money out of writing about it afterwards. Some might even wonder if two such events could be linked.

A communications officer and fundraiser that didn't communicate or raise any funds cost £30,00 Show us your sums on the cost. Just one thing on its own that person did was to get a funding approval of £300,000 for the Club. However, that obviously needed torpedoing though as it wouldn't have made a very good chapter in the book.  
The money wasted on TAL feasability study What are you talking about? I have no idea what money was or wasn't spent on a "feasibility study" on TAL. However, the Club had an agreement with the Council to develop TAL and were proceeding with that development as we all know. It was the Council that subsequently cancelled it, as we all know, and then provided an alternative, far bigger and better site with additional funding which more than made up for any money spent on TAL. You're saying TAL would have been much better I take it. 
Another fund raiser who has a name similar to a boxer called Carl and a singer called Pete who took loads from FC in bogus  'expense' claims A person who raised funds for the Club, so what? I take it you were up in arms about the fund raisers appointed and paid for with no return since the summer of 2016? What bogus expense claims? Show your workings.
Then there's the vicar who also cost us loads Loads of what? That person was a major force in driving the community work from scratch when the club was set up, and was responsible for the Club developing a reputation that was the main reason for Manchester City Council and other organisations putting funding and resources into the club without which there would have been no ground of any sort. Or is it your problem that he had religious beliefs?and the woman who was employed to prepare the club ready for BP ie a sort of BDM/ Commercial Manager who had never managed anything more than a laundrette Where do you get the launderette from? The commercial side took longer to get going than other areas of the Club after taking over the ground, that’s a matter of record. As is the fact that in spite of the time now spent in the ground and other expensive employees and self-employed consultants being brought in to manage it there have been no improvements.
As for HMRC , care to supply any facts ? There was nothing to declare , so once again your no transparency theory is blown out of the water. I know nothing other than what was on the forums about this. You obviously know more so give us the benefit of your ITK.

As for the International clearence affair , do you know who cost us ? [Don't know why I use 'us' because you are not part of Fc] Probably some overworked volunteer because too many people are happy to let ohters do the work What? You mean like you? Do you know or don’t you whose mistake it was? If such an important matter was being dealt with by a volunteer it should have been overseen by a senior employee and if it wasn’t then that is sheer incompetence by the Board. 

Hope that's not too complicated for you to understand , Georgie boy It’s a shame you don’t seem able to think for yourself Fergie,you can only regurgitate what you have been fed, but it’s all a bit too late now. The damage since the summer of 16 has been done and despite the gloating and posturing of many people most of it is beyond repair.

Not bad after 453 attempts.  For anything you post in the future you might want to concentrate on cutting out a lot of the dribble contained in all 453 previous missives.  Facts instead of hot wind and rhetoric.

List the cock ups, ignorance and piss poor decisions under the previous regime(s) and I'll then you give chapter on verse on them and also the original question.  That's fair isn't it? 

Quid pro quo?

Its good too hear bazz that your finally acknowledging that the former regime made lots of mistakes.you never know we could see you back doing your volunteering again