|
Post by freebarrygeorge on May 25, 2021 16:09:53 GMT
Innit strange how after a couple of years of relative silence that all of a sudden out from under the same slimy rock crawl the 3 shit stirrers Puppers followed by the The Rathen Walk Hooligan and of course old brown tongue himself, Desmondo the Leprechaun Wonder if old Puppers in the absence of a few ticket touting opportunities will stand for the Board again to create his usual mayhem for a week or so before he gets bored again, resigns and disappears back under the aforementioned rock??
|
|
|
Post by thunderwing on May 26, 2021 9:45:42 GMT
Innit strange how after a couple of years of relative silence that all of a sudden out from under the same slimy rock crawl the 3 shit stirrers Puppers followed by the The Rathen Walk Hooligan and of course old brown tongue himself, Desmondo the Leprechaun Wonder if old Puppers in the absence of a few ticket touting opportunities will stand for the Board again to create his usual mayhem for a week or so before he gets bored again, resigns and disappears back under the aforementioned rock?? FEC? Ambulance chasing "nest-feathering wanker", charlatan? Liar? Deception? Bullshit? Zero contrition? Resignation? Not right is it?
|
|
callum
Junior Member
Posts: 59
|
Post by callum on Jul 1, 2021 16:48:15 GMT
I notice TRWH has popped up on the Official and gone all snowflake on someone calling him and his ilk hurty names.
He wasn't in the meeting at the start so didn't even hear what was said (no doubt alerted by one of the lickspittles) logged on and used the chat box that was there for the purpose of asking questions of the board to demand an apology.
We need a poll.
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Jul 1, 2021 18:41:29 GMT
“a 'pack of dogs mentality' pursuing a 'trial by social media' and forcing a resignation outside of the democratic process”.
Sounds like a fair description from the member in the meeting of the tone of that thread on the official. The barristers son is obviously trying to draw the member out so they can do the same to him.
|
|
|
Post by thunderwing on Jul 2, 2021 10:45:19 GMT
I notice TRWH has popped up on the Official and gone all snowflake on someone calling him and his ilk hurty names. He wasn't in the meeting at the start so didn't even hear what was said (no doubt alerted by one of the lickspittles) logged on and used the chat box that was there for the purpose of asking questions of the board to demand an apology. We need a poll.
Blimey Callum you must be pretty bored if this playground tittle tattle floats your boat 1 - are you a member? 2 - are you an obsessed member? 3 - Did you "attend" the meeting? 4 - If your feelings are that strong then why didn't you say something at the time? 5 - Why not get yourself along to game and have a man to man (men) with any (or all three|) of them? Get the poll up and don't forget to include "Andy Walker".
|
|
|
Post by freebarrygeorge on Jul 2, 2021 16:55:36 GMT
I notice TRWH has popped up on the Official and gone all snowflake on someone calling him and his ilk hurty names. He wasn't in the meeting at the start so didn't even hear what was said (no doubt alerted by one of the lickspittles) logged on and used the chat box that was there for the purpose of asking questions of the board to demand an apology. We need a poll.
Blimey Callum you must be pretty bored if this playground tittle tattle floats your boat 1 - are you a member? 2 - are you an obsessed member? 3 - Did you "attend" the meeting? 4 - If your feelings are that strong then why didn't you say something at the time? 5 - Why not get yourself along to game and have a man to man (men) with any (or all three|) of them? Get the poll up and don't forget to include "Andy Walker". Answering on his behalf my little RWH:- 1 The more pertinent question would have been "were you a member"? 2 The more pertinent question would have been "were you once an obsessed member of FC before old puppers & co arrived back from the wilderness in 2015? 3 Did you attend the meeting (not that its of any relevance whether any of us did)? 4 Through fear of puppers or his henchmen seeking at best, verbal retribution and more likely, physical retribution 5 As Q4 Andy Walker had more principals in his little finger than you and your delightful cohorts could ever dream of possessing in your whole beings. Back over to you Pal
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Jul 3, 2021 8:51:53 GMT
This is not fairy story stuff Thunders. It’s not made up. Just to remind you of one of many examples. Late at night the PM decided to text a volunteer a message with no details other than the volunteers address. This person was at home with their partner at the time and I’m sure you can imagine the worry that this caused the partner thinking that a madman was on his way around to their house in the middle of the night to do who knows what.
The PM obviously didn’t go round but his text had the desired effect of scaring that partner half to death leading to the volunteer having to walk away from FC.
Any person with that mindset capable of that type of intimidation should have no place in any organisation never mind “making friends not millionaires” FC.
Likewise anyone who has anything to do with anybody like that has, to a greater or lesser extent, a similar mindset. If not then they should either walk away or do everything they can to force those people out of the club.
|
|
|
Post by thunderwing on Jul 5, 2021 10:43:08 GMT
Blimey Callum you must be pretty bored if this playground tittle tattle floats your boat 1 - are you a member? 2 - are you an obsessed member? 3 - Did you "attend" the meeting? 4 - If your feelings are that strong then why didn't you say something at the time? 5 - Why not get yourself along to game and have a man to man (men) with any (or all three|) of them? Get the poll up and don't forget to include "Andy Walker". Answering on his behalf my little RWH:- 1 The more pertinent question would have been "were you a member"? 2 The more pertinent question would have been "were you once an obsessed member of FC before old puppers & co arrived back from the wilderness in 2015? 3 Did you attend the meeting (not that its of any relevance whether any of us did)? 4 Through fear of puppers or his henchmen seeking at best, verbal retribution and more likely, physical retribution 5 As Q4 Andy Walker had more principals in his little finger than you and your delightful cohorts could ever dream of possessing in your whole beings. Back over to you Pal That's a mighty statement that you've made there on point 4 only trumped by your attempt at comedy with the Andy Walker statement. Just remind me of the net balance for the amount he got paid for his sponsorship role and the amount of sponsorship actually he brought in. Don't rush now
|
|
|
Post by thunderwing on Jul 5, 2021 13:13:51 GMT
This is not fairy story stuff Thunders. It’s not made up. Just to remind you of one of many examples. Allegedly - Late at night the PM decided to text a volunteer a message with no details other than the volunteers address. This person was at home with their partner at the time and I’m sure you can imagine the worry that this caused the partner thinking that a madman was on his way around to their house in the middle of the night to do who knows what. The PM obviously didn’t go round but his text had the desired effect of scaring that partner half to death leading to the volunteer having to walk away from FC. Any person with that mindset capable of that type of intimidation should have no place in any organisation never mind “making friends not millionaires” FC. Likewise anyone who has anything to do with anybody like that has, to a greater or lesser extent, a similar mindset. If not then they should either walk away or do everything they can to force those people out of the club. Crikey was this substantiated and investigated? If so, what was the outcome? It's pretty damning but probably no worse than saying to a baby I hope that your father hangs himself. Myths and larger than life exploits become exaggerated or change over time. I'm sure you've got loads more.
|
|
|
Post by freebarrygeorge on Jul 5, 2021 14:14:54 GMT
Answering on his behalf my little RWH:- 1 The more pertinent question would have been "were you a member"? 2 The more pertinent question would have been "were you once an obsessed member of FC before old puppers & co arrived back from the wilderness in 2015? 3 Did you attend the meeting (not that its of any relevance whether any of us did)? 4 Through fear of puppers or his henchmen seeking at best, verbal retribution and more likely, physical retribution 5 As Q4 Andy Walker had more principals in his little finger than you and your delightful cohorts could ever dream of possessing in your whole beings. Back over to you Pal That's a mighty statement that you've made there on point 4 only trumped by your attempt at comedy with the Andy Walker statement. Just remind me of the net balance for the amount he got paid for his sponsorship role and the amount of sponsorship actually he brought in. Don't rush now Oh Hipz you do make me smile from the very man who put the Iron in Irony Lets continue the discussion about value for money shall we Can you just remind me who shoehorned Damian Chadwick, into a £50k + per year position at FC after Mssrs Walker and Walsh had departed as part of his "masterplan" What value did FC get from that, and weirdly enough, if your rather selective memory stretches that far back, remind us all who it was that started the campaign of disgraceful hate that saw the once lauded messiah leave FC when, predictably, it went tits up?? Over to you mate
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Jul 5, 2021 15:33:01 GMT
This is not fairy story stuff Thunders. It’s not made up. Just to remind you of one of many examples. Allegedly - Late at night the PM decided to text a volunteer a message with no details other than the volunteers address. This person was at home with their partner at the time and I’m sure you can imagine the worry that this caused the partner thinking that a madman was on his way around to their house in the middle of the night to do who knows what. The PM obviously didn’t go round but his text had the desired effect of scaring that partner half to death leading to the volunteer having to walk away from FC. Any person with that mindset capable of that type of intimidation should have no place in any organisation never mind “making friends not millionaires” FC. Likewise anyone who has anything to do with anybody like that has, to a greater or lesser extent, a similar mindset. If not then they should either walk away or do everything they can to force those people out of the club. Crikey was this substantiated and investigated? If so, what was the outcome? It's pretty damning but probably no worse than saying to a baby I hope that your father hangs himself. Myths and larger than life exploits become exaggerated or change over time. I'm sure you've got loads more. It's 100% true Thunders, don't try to play it down. If you don't believe me ask the PM the next time you're selling him a half time draw ticket.
|
|
|
Post by thunderwing on Jul 5, 2021 15:38:53 GMT
That's a mighty statement that you've made there on point 4 only trumped by your attempt at comedy with the Andy Walker statement. Just remind me of the net balance for the amount he got paid for his sponsorship role and the amount of sponsorship actually he brought in. Don't rush now Oh Hipz you do make me smile from the very man who put the Iron in Irony Lets continue the discussion about value for money shall we Can you just remind me who shoehorned Damian Chadwick, into a £50k + per year position at FC after Mssrs Walker and Walsh had departed as part of his "masterplan" What value did FC get from that, and weirdly enough, if your rather selective memory stretches that far back, remind us all who it was that started the campaign of disgraceful hate that saw the once lauded messiah leave FC when, predictably, it went tits up?? Over to you mate Chadwicks appointment went through a proper selection process. I would refer you to the rather excellent and unchallenged Red Rebels. All fact. You could always edit it a la Council of Nicea in a version to suit your teams needs. That's not going to happen though. Now that would be interesting. It wasn't disgraceful although I do sense why most sycophants would interpretation find it hateful. Wavy fingers protest summed it up pour moi. She had some bottle . Hysterical and hysterically funny.
|
|
|
Post by freebarrygeorge on Jul 5, 2021 20:44:22 GMT
Oh Hipz you do make me smile from the very man who put the Iron in Irony Lets continue the discussion about value for money shall we Can you just remind me who shoehorned Damian Chadwick, into a £50k + per year position at FC after Mssrs Walker and Walsh had departed as part of his "masterplan" What value did FC get from that, and weirdly enough, if your rather selective memory stretches that far back, remind us all who it was that started the campaign of disgraceful hate that saw the once lauded messiah leave FC when, predictably, it went tits up?? Over to you mate Chadwicks appointment went through a proper selection process. I would refer you to the rather excellent and unchallenged Red Rebels. All fact. You could always edit it a la Council of Nicea in a version to suit your teams needs. That's not going to happen though. Now that would be interesting. It wasn't disgraceful although I do sense why most sycophants would interpretation find it hateful. Wavy fingers protest summed it up pour moi. She had some bottle . Hysterical and hysterically funny. Yep indeed I did read Red Rebels. Unfortunately though in my copy the period from around 2008 until Broadhurst Park opened in 2015 after all the hard work by the Walshocracy had taken place appeared to be missing. Wonder what old Puppers was getting up to during those 7 or 8 years?? Must have been plenty of events where he could flog tickets for major events at grossly inflated prices. You wont know though what happened for the early part of that missing period as it would have been difficult for you to attend because of the place you were residing in at the time.
|
|
|
Post by freebarrygeorge on Jul 8, 2021 17:36:16 GMT
You still with us Thundz??
You appear to have forgot to answer my question??
|
|
|
Post by thunderwing on Jul 13, 2021 12:52:28 GMT
You still with us Thundz?? You appear to have forgot to answer my question?? Of course I am. It's all set out correctly in the book which unfortunately doesn't fit with your version because it's the verified truth. Perhaps you should read it again.
|
|