|
Post by jeepster on Dec 3, 2021 23:14:27 GMT
Then they came for the chair slingers. But I don't sling chairs, so I did nothing.
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Dec 4, 2021 9:28:04 GMT
Can anyone advise if the Club Secretary has made any comment on the veracity of the CS’s and the BS’s candidacy in these elections? If not she is failing in her duties to ensure that Club rules are being adhered to.
It seems to be common knowledge that the BS has some sort of conviction which, depending on the details, could prohibit him from standing for the board. The CS should not be standing again after resigning, according to Club rules. It has been clearly demonstrated by candidates themselves in the last few weeks what turmoil the club is currently in, on virtually all fronts. Therefore how can members have any confidence that this election is being conducted according to Club rules without a public ruling and explanation of each candidates compliance with the rules from the Club Secretary? She is not fulfilling her duties if she does not directly address this issue.
In the meantime either the election should be postponed or failing that, members should not vote for either the CS or the BS until there is clarification that their candidacies are compliant.
|
|
|
Post by thunderwing on Dec 4, 2021 12:51:17 GMT
Can anyone advise if the Club Secretary has made any comment on the veracity of the CS’s and the BS’s candidacy in these elections? If not she is failing in her duties to ensure that Club rules are being adhered to. It seems to be common knowledge that the BS has some sort of conviction which, depending on the details, could prohibit him from standing for the board. The CS should not be standing again after resigning, according to Club rules. It has been clearly demonstrated by candidates themselves in the last few weeks what turmoil the club is currently in, on virtually all fronts. Therefore how can members have any confidence that this election is being conducted according to Club rules without a public ruling and explanation of each candidates compliance with the rules from the Club Secretary? She is not fulfilling her duties if she does not directly address this issue. In the meantime either the election should be postponed or failing that, members should not vote for either the CS or the BS until there is clarification that their candidacies are compliant. And that's EXACTLY why you are in the wilderness because to say that you are CLUELESS is a massive understatement. You should immediately get familiar with the clubs rules and any legislation regarding convictions that are spent. Not only is it discrimatory it is illegal. All the time you spend with your obsessive quest to bring back your so called glory days under the previous bent and useless regime is purile to say the least. DENNIS sends his regards.
|
|
|
Post by freebarrygeorge on Dec 4, 2021 14:37:53 GMT
Can anyone advise if the Club Secretary has made any comment on the veracity of the CS’s and the BS’s candidacy in these elections? If not she is failing in her duties to ensure that Club rules are being adhered to. It seems to be common knowledge that the BS has some sort of conviction which, depending on the details, could prohibit him from standing for the board. The CS should not be standing again after resigning, according to Club rules. It has been clearly demonstrated by candidates themselves in the last few weeks what turmoil the club is currently in, on virtually all fronts. Therefore how can members have any confidence that this election is being conducted according to Club rules without a public ruling and explanation of each candidates compliance with the rules from the Club Secretary? She is not fulfilling her duties if she does not directly address this issue. In the meantime either the election should be postponed or failing that, members should not vote for either the CS or the BS until there is clarification that their candidacies are compliant. And that's EXACTLY why you are in the wilderness because to say that you are CLUELESS is a massive understatement. You should immediately get familiar with the clubs rules and any legislation regarding convictions that are spent. Not only is it discrimatory it is illegal. All the time you spend with your obsessive quest to bring back your so called glory days under the previous bent and useless regime is purile to say the least. DENNIS sends his regards. You need to spend some time a) giving your false tribute to the first Board Member you have got rid of and b) getting rid of the old chair slinger. Only then can you fully concentrate on persecuting the other candidates for the poisoned chalice
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Dec 4, 2021 21:59:55 GMT
Can anyone advise if the Club Secretary has made any comment on the veracity of the CS’s and the BS’s candidacy in these elections? If not she is failing in her duties to ensure that Club rules are being adhered to. It seems to be common knowledge that the BS has some sort of conviction which, depending on the details, could prohibit him from standing for the board. The CS should not be standing again after resigning, according to Club rules. It has been clearly demonstrated by candidates themselves in the last few weeks what turmoil the club is currently in, on virtually all fronts. Therefore how can members have any confidence that this election is being conducted according to Club rules without a public ruling and explanation of each candidates compliance with the rules from the Club Secretary? She is not fulfilling her duties if she does not directly address this issue. In the meantime either the election should be postponed or failing that, members should not vote for either the CS or the BS until there is clarification that their candidacies are compliant. And that's EXACTLY why you are in the wilderness because to say that you are CLUELESS is a massive understatement. You should immediately get familiar with the clubs rules and any legislation regarding convictions that are spent. Not only is it discrimatory it is illegal. All the time you spend with your obsessive quest to bring back your so called glory days under the previous bent and useless regime is purile to say the least. DENNIS sends his regards. I note you give no explanation of your argument. Just a nonsensical rant as usual.You should stand for the board.
|
|
|
Post by freebarrygeorge on Dec 5, 2021 18:06:33 GMT
Mr Z, without doubt you have shown what an odious vile piece of shit you are by failing publicly to acknowledge the sterling work carried out by the PM's mole on the Official Forum.
I hope that if the 6 members who actually vote are stupid enough to vote you on the board that Karma comes back and bites you in the most sensitive parts of your anatomy.
You are scum.
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Dec 5, 2021 21:40:55 GMT
Mr Z, without doubt you have shown what an odious vile piece of shit you are by failing publicly to acknowledge the sterling work carried out by the PM's mole on the Official Forum. I hope that if the 6 members who actually vote are stupid enough to vote you on the board that Karma comes back and bites you in the most sensitive parts of your anatomy. You are scum. Wonder why the CS decided to quote this post on the official today? His response to it was strangely ambiguous. It would have been far more illuminating had he chosen to quote a few of the posts about himself.
|
|
|
Post by jeepster on Dec 5, 2021 23:42:28 GMT
Mr Z, without doubt you have shown what an odious vile piece of shit you are by failing publicly to acknowledge the sterling work carried out by the PM's mole on the Official Forum. I hope that if the 6 members who actually vote are stupid enough to vote you on the board that Karma comes back and bites you in the most sensitive parts of your anatomy. You are scum. Wonder why the CS decided to quote this post on the official today? His response to it was strangely ambiguous. It would have been far more illuminating had he chosen to quote a few of the posts about himself. I think it's telling that he chose to re-post this, in a poor attempt to take any moral high ground.
Very similar to when the Tory front bench were recently up in arms when Angela Rayner (MP for Ashton) chose to use the same word to describe Bozo. Then it stank of slyly trying to undermine the common words of somebody they consider to use inferior language, even though she was correct and explained her use of the word well. The posh men suddenly found some new-found sense of behaviour and were so easily offended. Not dissimilar here today and all a bit Helen Lovejoy.
Telling that quite a few others have remarked on the official, in a safer vein obviously, at the lack of gratitude shown to somebody who has put a lot of work into the club. Happened many times over the past few years and indeed a few times this year. Shows a lack of class and is charmless.
No wonder volunteers and employees feel unappreciated and frequently depart.
|
|
|
Post by freebarrygeorge on Dec 6, 2021 7:13:40 GMT
Odds that the repugnant Mr Z will now follow in the footsteps of his delightful master, mentor and organ grinder and pull out of the elections now that he has caused a shit storm and once again divided the club?
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Dec 6, 2021 21:06:52 GMT
The shirt vote. Another cock up!
It may not be the end of the world but it’s just another example of mismanagement from this board. It’s not certain if one design will pass league rules due to the clash with referees and two of the others, it comes to light 2 days before the AGM, that they include the Manchester City Council coat of arms for which we will have to pay the council a fee for each shirt sold. YCNMIU!
No doubt votes have already been cast, but there is no way that the club should be paying any trade mark fees per shirt to any organisation. The vote must be scrapped, the designs amended and the vote held again.
Total and utter incompetence.
|
|
|
Post by thunderwing on Dec 7, 2021 6:42:01 GMT
The shirt vote. Another cock up! Allegedly. Allegedly it may not be the end of the world but it’s just another alleged example of mismanagement from this board. Allegedly and so I can make it up as I go along it’s not certain if one design will pass league rules due to the clash with referees and two of the others, it comes to light 2 days before the AGM, that they include the Manchester City Council coat of arms for which we will allegedly have to pay the council a fee for each shirt sold. YCNMIU allegedly! No doubt votes have already been cast, allegedly there is no way that the club should be paying any trade mark fees per shirt to any organisation. I can't back this up as I don't have the information although a simple call to MCC would have clarified this but it would have taken the edge off another of my blabbering fictional masterpieces. The vote must be scrapped, the designs amended and the vote held again. Total and utter incompetence. Allegedly To:- Shadow CC:- Boopster: FBG Sent:- Tuesday 7th December Re:- Things................ There you go. May keep you off the naughty chair but NO GUARANTEES. Notice you used the word "we" above. Are you back on board (so to speak)? Hope not. DENNIS sends his regards.
|
|
|
Post by freebarrygeorge on Dec 7, 2021 7:51:19 GMT
The shirt vote. Another cock up! Allegedly. Allegedly it may not be the end of the world but it’s just another alleged example of mismanagement from this board. Allegedly and so I can make it up as I go along it’s not certain if one design will pass league rules due to the clash with referees and two of the others, it comes to light 2 days before the AGM, that they include the Manchester City Council coat of arms for which we will allegedly have to pay the council a fee for each shirt sold. YCNMIU allegedly! No doubt votes have already been cast, allegedly there is no way that the club should be paying any trade mark fees per shirt to any organisation. I can't back this up as I don't have the information although a simple call to MCC would have clarified this but it would have taken the edge off another of my blabbering fictional masterpieces. The vote must be scrapped, the designs amended and the vote held again. Total and utter incompetence. Allegedly To:- Shadow CC:- Boopster: FBG Sent:- Tuesday 7th December Re:- Things................ There you go. May keep you off the naughty chair but NO GUARANTEES. Notice you used the word "we" above. Are you back on board (so to speak)? Hope not. DENNIS sends his regards. WTF you on about pal?
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Dec 7, 2021 9:37:54 GMT
There is a lot of grand talk about the Club Vision and the proposed Committee structure but it has one major flaw. The members at the centre of the Club refuse to accept that there is a toxic atmosphere at the Club and that toxic atmosphere is a major negative factor holding the Club back. Appointment after appointment, both employee and volunteer, has failed over the last 6 years with the common issue being the personal treatment they have received. Unless a decision is made to change this culture the Club will never move forward again. Volunteers are being asked to come forward to fill vacancies on the committees but many who have the required skills will not do so because of the toxic culture at the heart of the club. Those that do come forward will no doubt fall by the wayside as so many have done before them due to workload and the unhealthy club atmosphere. Ultimately the work will fall back onto a small group of people who won't have the time or inclination to move ahead with the proposed changes. Hmmm..... Only one of the existing committee members applied by the deadline, which has now had to be extended.
|
|
|
Post by freebarrygeorge on Dec 13, 2021 7:55:52 GMT
Thundz Thundz where art though? Your absence from FC Forums both official and unofficial recently has been duly noted. Have your fingers dropped off, your computer out of action or have you realised that the vast majority of readers of all the forums now have proof that you are a complete tit and that you are keeping a low profile in anticipation that the wider membership will vote for RON accordingly. Or of course, have you and your liccle mentor fallen foul of each other and not having a mind of your own, simply run out of ideas and polls? Dear dear Dennis might not be up for tennis but good old RON might just be the one
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Dec 20, 2021 14:05:46 GMT
Voting closed at noon today. So, what's the betting? Who's in and who's out?
|
|