|
Post by facedontfit on Apr 15, 2018 16:24:31 GMT
Wrong information sorry. It's the PM that has resigned from the board. Now free to continue his character assassinations from The sidelines ?
|
|
|
Post by frankbough on Apr 15, 2018 16:53:07 GMT
And look at the collective breast beating and prophecies of the end of the world as a result from the same people who spoke of a cult of personality dominating the club when <NAME REMOVED by Admin> was in charge, stunning levels of cognitive dissonance.
|
|
|
Post by jonnyashton on Apr 15, 2018 17:11:29 GMT
It's a stunt. He wants to be loved. He wants to be begged. Or is he off to South America to his other life and it's an opportunity to (like a rat) leave a ship heading to a disaster as he knows the damage he's done.
|
|
|
Post by jeepster on Apr 15, 2018 17:28:37 GMT
It's a stunt. He wants to be loved. He wants to be begged. Or is he off to South America to his other life and it's an opportunity to (like a rat) leave a ship heading to a disaster as he knows the damage he's done. I make you right. A mixture of a tantrum and a gamble. Nanna's Knitted Jumper to follow him in resigning if he doesn't get his way. Had his money back, and more besides, and seen off the achievers of the glorious first decade.
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Apr 16, 2018 9:17:43 GMT
He won't resign.
He spat his dummy out in 2015 saying he was off for good. Two minutes later he was back hounding and intimidating people on a mission to destroy the Club. He needs to stay on until he's finished his prophecy before his parting shot of "Don't blame me, I did everything I could".
Supporters and members have allowed themselves to be brainwashed by the PM and a few of his hanger ons. They are still incapable of understanding what has happened on their watch. They still cling forlornly to their mantra that it was all the <NAME REMOVED by Admin> fault without daring to look at the timeline of when everything changed.
Without the PM you would have had a thriving club with average crowds of over 3,000. The SMRE would have been built and generating funds alongside the main function room.
Funding that was in the pipeline for the Main Stand would have finished off the ends and created additional seating for both home and away supporters. Plans for the away terracing and facilities would be ready to implement and the football side would continue to benefit from the level of support home and away.
Instead, you now have a Club where swathes of people have walked away. Membership is almost half what it was. People no longer care. Season ticket numbers have plummeted and a significant portion of future ST sales has already been spent on nothing. The DF has been raided against Club rules and is dying on it's feet - the person "in charge" wouldn't know how to fund raise to save his life. He must be the least engaging person at the Club.
There is a CEO who believes he isn't accountable to the members, only to the Board and therefore doesn't attend General Meetings. We have a CEO who has driven football policy and spending without the slightest idea of what he is doing - why does a former hotel events manager think he can lead on football matters? It's crazy. We have a financial controller who doesn't know when the company year end is and we have no real idea of where all the money has gone.
Finally we have a current of nastiness and intimidation that was brought into the club by one man three years ago which is now all pervasive. It has become the norm to the extent that some Board members have felt they have no option other than to resign and the remainder are openly fighting in front of members. If you were an outside organisation looking in and you were asked to contribute financially to this Club now, what would you think? Would you think "This Club is on the rise, I want to be a part of it"? Or would you think, "What a mess, that club is dying on it's feet and leave me out of it please". I know what most people would think.
The PM pied piper has played his tune and you're all blindly following him over the edge of the cliff.
|
|
|
Post by jonnyashton on Apr 16, 2018 11:53:12 GMT
Many put a massive amount of cash into the Cs. All did this without knowledge of the the present incumbents planning a takeover. How on earth was the chief allowed to take his share when the rest have to wait? Or as it looks like not get a reimbursement. Only a handful who knew the plan will walk away unhindered. He wasn't there when we built the ground, fought in the courts, dealt with useless contractors and neglecting family in order to create the club. Yet he and his playthings are in control. I have written off a decent amount of cash. But that's not too important. The hard work totally written off along with a fuck you thrown in does niggle.
|
|
|
Post by frankbough on Apr 16, 2018 18:49:21 GMT
Among all the please don't go supplications from the assorted sychophants we've now got the old modus operandi back in full swing in the form of a nakedly transparent proxy post just created on the official forum.
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Apr 16, 2018 19:37:43 GMT
Among all the please don't go supplications from the assorted sychophants we've now got the old modus operandi back in full swing in the form of a nakedly transparent proxy post just created on the official forum. Absolutely correct. I think the member (AS) posting on his behalf has questions to answer.
|
|
|
Post by redstars on Apr 16, 2018 20:22:35 GMT
How on earth was the chief allowed to take his share when the rest have to wait? I guess you'd have to ask the individuals who constituted the board at the time. I have a hunch a few of them frequent this forum.
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Apr 17, 2018 8:28:01 GMT
Did he receive the "resignation form" (??) he requested and then complete it?
|
|
|
Post by jonnyashton on Apr 17, 2018 16:45:44 GMT
I don't go on the members forum. So don't really get what the scrapping is truly about. Though on tsio a question being asked about how Curzon manage. I would say that it doesn't have a CEO on a ridiculous wage. Nor several other people milking the club or using it for their own gain. (Sounds familiar that, doesn't it?).
Another comment re the "<NAME REMOVED by Admin>. I can't be arsed looking at it but it suggested they'd be pleased. Nothing sadder. Do they think (said this before, I know) we wanted this 3 years ago. That tells me much about the mindset of the us and them. It could have been much different and democratic but everybody that stood up to the dictator was eliminated. Too late now though, he's set his stall out and he is all conquering.
In the end he'll make more dollar from the club with part 2.
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Apr 17, 2018 21:21:00 GMT
The PM and the Chairman are tearing the real chair apart, piece by piece over a lump sum payment. We could be down to 5 board members soon if it carries on (assuming the PM has gone which is far from clear).
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Apr 18, 2018 11:40:49 GMT
This has got to be the most tedious point scoring version of "he said - she said" ever seen. They might as well all say to each other "I think you're a twat" and then get on with the rest of their lives.
|
|
|
Post by jeepster on Apr 18, 2018 12:05:07 GMT
Did he receive the "resignation form" (??) he requested and then complete it? More chance of finding a one-ended stick.
|
|
|
Post by frankbough on Apr 18, 2018 12:24:44 GMT
Remember the outrage (justifiably imo in many respects) when <NAME REMOVED by Admin> of SD was appointed to undertake an investigation on alleged online abuse of board members, the accusation of cronyism and he was anything but independent as a big buddy of <NAME REMOVED by Admin>
Plus ca change....
|
|